Ripple CEO Says Company Once Considered Shutting Down After SEC Lawsuit

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the company seriously considered winding down and distributing its XRP holdings to shareholders after the SEC sued in 2020. He said Ripple ultimately chose to fight, preserving jobs but spending about $150 million on legal costs over four years.

Ripple CEO Says Company Once Considered Shutting Down After SEC Lawsuit

What happened?

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the company seriously considered winding down and distributing its XRP holdings to shareholders after the SEC sued in 2020. He said Ripple ultimately chose to fight, preserving jobs but spending about $150 million on legal costs over four years.

Why it matters

Ripple once considered shutting down and distributing its XRP holdings to shareholders after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued the company in 2020, CEO Brad Garlinghouse said. Speaking at the University of Kansas School of Business, Garlinghouse said he and Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen weighed winding down the company before deciding to contest the case.

Ripple once considered shutting down and distributing its XRP holdings to shareholders after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued the company in 2020, CEO Brad Garlinghouse said. Speaking at the University of Kansas School of Business, Garlinghouse said he and Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen weighed winding down the company before deciding to contest the case.

The episode matters because it shows how close one of crypto’s best-known companies came to disappearing under regulatory pressure. According to Garlinghouse, closing Ripple would have ended hundreds of jobs, while fighting the SEC ultimately cost the company about $150 million in legal fees over four years.

The SEC sued Ripple in 2020, alleging that the company had sold XRP as an unregistered security. The agency also named Garlinghouse and Larsen personally in the case. Garlinghouse said he had met with SEC officials several times between 2017 and 2019 without a lawyer and was not told that XRP could be treated as a security.

Garlinghouse said Ripple held a large amount of XRP and could have distributed those holdings to shareholders on a pro rata basis before dissolving. Instead, the company chose to continue operating and defend itself in court.

Ripple later prevailed on a key point when Judge Analisa Torres ruled that XRP itself is not a security. The company and the SEC settled in May 2025, after a change in SEC leadership under the Trump administration brought a more accommodating stance toward the crypto sector.

Source: CoinDesk

Keep exploring

Related stories

Bitget to Leave Japan and Close Remaining Positions by Year-End

Bitget to Leave Japan and Close Remaining Positions by Year-End

Bitget plans to exit the Japanese market and close all remaining positions by the end of the year. The move adds to ongoing shifts among crypto companies navigating Japan’s regulatory environment.

Read
State of Crypto countdown highlights key industry developments

State of Crypto countdown highlights key industry developments

CoinDesk’s State of Crypto coverage counts down recent developments shaping the crypto policy and market landscape. The report frames these changes as important for how companies and participants navigate the sector.

Read
Strategy Keeps STRC Dividend at 12%

Strategy Keeps STRC Dividend at 12%

Strategy said it is holding the dividend on its STRC preferred stock at 12%. The decision keeps the payout unchanged for investors in the company’s yield-focused security.

Read